Slav defence, most of the open lines. Soft cover. Number of pages GM Konstantin Sakaev, twice Olympic champion, is joining the Chess Evolution team and will be publishing two books on the Slav defense. Web Forum: ChessPub Forum – Complete Slav by Sakaev.
|Published (Last):||23 April 2017|
|PDF File Size:||17.23 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||11.27 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Had a quick glance at this- very messy indeed but the content may be alright. It also includes lines after 5. Chebanenko – Still Improved! Not great coverage though imho, but not bad either. Well, I sold my copy of vol. Please select next action Go back or Go to wish list. Quite popular line in former times: Got my copy of Vol.
Complete Slav II
Practical Decisions in Critical Moments. Also other possibilities such as 5. But the last corr databases on the market should have the same games, making the work I dakaev far much easier and quicker. Concerning the bibliography, none of my books will have one as the analysis is mostly culled from my personal files, which invariably have unattributed analysis all over the place interested as I am in the chess than the individuals. Discount will be calculated in the shopping basket.
Complete Slav II – Konstantin Sakaev
Kf8 as a serious try, then I must chalk it up as an author error. I always use chesslive.
All of presented variations are analyzed to the same level as those described in the first part of the series. I will endeavor compleye append the analysis in an update. Konstantin Sakaev The second part of the Complete Slav contains all systems that were not included in part one, namely a popular variation 3. This example was minor, but it was one of many examples where I was waiting is thoughts.
Na2 is interesting, and this is also the idea of both Sakaev and Burgess. Just purchasing something samaev this http: Now about this line: Complete Slav II – covers: View sample pages pdf. But none of Paulsen or Sakaev analyse I don’t understand why the chess world, many autors or GM in their preparation don’t use correspondance play!! As for game dates not passing in correspondence, this can be chalked up to not seeing anything newer of interest at the time of writing at the time! I only could speak about the line I have analysed before with other sources or by myself, maybe there is part of the book which is better but I have the impression that I didn’t learn much not much prose, and analysis not always that profound.
Dreev didn’t check ICCF has stopped allowing free downloads of the games played on their server and restricted it to members. In such situations Sakaev decided to only describe why certain moves do not deserve to be examined deeply.
Since Dreev’s book, there have been a lot of And this is not completd only example of that type What on earth were they thinking? Part 1 Play The Dutch: Please Login or Register. Publishedsoftback, pages. Bg5 are examined deeply, namely Moscow The book covers the state of theory upto July I will give some examples about the parts of the analysis I know quite well.
The prohibition for “outsiders” to get access to the files is not very efficient since anyone who knows an ICCF-member can get saiaev files forwarded. The Main-Line, Meran, Botvinnik variation and much more.
Konstantin Sakaev: “Complete Slav I”
It’s free and there is both otb and correspondance in it. Paulsen’s book is far from perfect too, but the good side of Paulsen’s book is that it contains correspondance games but this book has no games more recents thanno bibliography. Well, you can be an ICCF member with a simple request, download the archives and never play a game there for the rest of your life, that’s true.
People who bought this also bought: Just register for ICCF, which is free, and download the games. First of all, the Moscow and Botvinnik variations have a lot of deep lines played in correspondance play.
Ludde Full Member Offline So much theory. Ditto for that other resource you mention, I have no excuse for missing that. Discussion forum for ChessPublishing.
Complete Slav I Price: It’s why I always loved the old “the complete” serie from Batsford, or alav “gambit” serie as “the Slav” from Burgess. Sakaev doesn’t even mention I do appreciate when people bring games of interest to me, because I am not omniscient.
Where Paulsen is clearly superior to Sakaev is here: